Tom Homan, the incoming border czar for President-elect Donald Trump, has suggested using military resources to assist in large-scale deportation operations. In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Homan outlined potential strategies for leveraging military bases in immigration enforcement.
Homan said the plan, which depends on congressional funding, includes using military facilities to detain illegal aliens or transport them back to their countries of origin. He noted that previous administrations, including those of Barack Obama and Joe Biden, had utilized military assets for similar purposes.
Democrats:
“Trump can’t use the military to help deport illegals!”Also Democrats:
Called in the National Guard to deport 50 illegals out of Martha’s Vineyard to a military base within 48 hrs of their arrival. pic.twitter.com/MByiQD8rjX— LD Basler (@ArmaLite15OU812) November 28, 2024
Although the military is restricted from making arrests, Homan emphasized its value as a logistical partner. “The military could act as a force multiplier,” he said, pointing to their capacity to support ICE operations.
President-elect Trump has vowed to make immigration enforcement a priority, pledging to finish the border wall and oversee the largest deportation campaign in the nation’s history. He has also announced plans to declare a national emergency on immigration, unlocking Department of Defense funding.
Trump’s Team Eyes Military Bases for Mass Deportations
Reports suggest that Donald Trump’s team, led by “border czar” Tom Homan, is considering the use of U.S. military bases and aircraft to detain and deport undocumented immigrants. pic.twitter.com/uoNK8bp7Nt
— Starship Alves 🚀 (@StarshipAlves) December 29, 2024
Homan’s proposal highlights the administration’s willingness to explore unconventional methods to enhance deportation efforts. By involving the military, the administration could significantly expand its enforcement reach.
The plan has sparked discussions about the appropriateness of using military resources for immigration purposes, with critics questioning its broader implications.
