Taxpayer-Funded Therapy Sessions Raise Concerns At State Department

Antony Blinken’s State Department is facing backlash after reports surfaced of therapy sessions held for employees upset by President-elect Donald Trump’s victory. The sessions, described as “cry sessions” by one insider, were reportedly funded with taxpayer money.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) condemned the move, calling it an unnecessary indulgence of partisan disappointment. In a letter to Blinken, Issa questioned the appropriateness of using public funds for such activities, particularly in light of the Department’s responsibility to implement the new administration’s policies.

Internal emails revealed that the State Department invited employees to stress management webinars following the election. Issa criticized this initiative, arguing that it reflects poorly on the Department’s ability to remain nonpartisan. He suggested that those unwilling to support President-elect Trump’s agenda should resign.

Issa also demanded a full accounting of the sessions, including their purpose, frequency, and cost. He expressed concern over the potential misuse of taxpayer funds and the precedent it sets for future administrations.

The controversy has sparked outrage among conservatives, who argue that the therapy sessions are a symptom of deeper political bias within federal agencies. Critics contend that government institutions must focus on their core missions and remain impartial during transitions of power.

This incident has reignited calls for stricter oversight of federal spending and greater accountability within government agencies. Many believe that public trust in federal institutions depends on their ability to act without partisan influence.