
In a disappointing move on Friday, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine (R) vetoed the “Saving Adolescents from Experimentation (SAFE) Act.” The legislation, heavily supported by DeWine’s own party, was designed to shield minors from the harmful impacts of so-called “gender-affirming” care. The SAFE Act also would have established clear boundaries in youth sports that would have prevented biological males from competing in female events.
The bill sponsored by State Rep. Gary Click (R) passed the Ohio House in a 62-27 vote and the state Senate by a vote of 24-8.
DeWine claimed his rationale for the veto was based on his argument that he was somehow protecting life. “I’ve also listened to youth and parents. Parents who have told me if not for this treatment, their child would be dead,” DeWine said. That point of view stands in sharp contrast with the traditional conservative stance that emphasizes the preservation of American family values and safeguarding children from decisions with irreversible adverse consequences.
Ohio's Republican governor vetoes bill that bans gender-affirming care for minors | Just The News https://t.co/5TooGDvEpr
— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) December 29, 2023
Critics of DeWine’s decision have been vocal. Former collegiate swimmer Riley Gaines labeled the Ohio governor a “spineless coward,” underscoring the deep disappointment felt by many who see this veto as a capitulation to progressive ideologies. Similarly, presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy criticized DeWine on X, formerly known as Twitter, for failing to uphold basic conservative principles that distinguish boys from girls in sports and protect children from radical medical procedures.
De-transitioner Chloe Cole’s remarks encapsulate the sentiment of betrayal felt by many in the conservative community. “Gov. DeWine’s political career is over. What a way to go out. Paid off by the medical lobby, which is insanely powerful in Ohio. Remember him for his desire to sterilize and mutilate children,” Cole stated.
Furthermore, Lt. Governor Jon Husted’s support for the bill highlights the internal rift within the Ohio Republican leadership, showcasing a divide between those adhering to traditional conservative values and those who appear to capitulate to the demands of a vocal minority.
Despite the backlash, DeWine now argues for a middle-ground compromise approach. He has directed agencies to prohibit gender-related surgeries for minors and called for a collaborative effort to address some of the concerns raised by GOP lawmakers in the bill. The approach does little to appease Ohioans who view the veto as a fundamental deviation from core Republican values.