Sir Elton John slams UK Labour government as “absolute losers” for allowing tech giants to steal artists’ work through AI without consent or payment.
At a Glance
- Elton John has condemned the UK government’s plans to exempt Big Tech companies from copyright laws for AI training
- He described the policy as “committing theft, thievery on a high scale” that will particularly harm young artists
- The House of Lords voted to protect artists’ rights, but the Labour government dismissed these recommendations
- Over 400 artists including Paul McCartney have signed a protest letter to Prime Minister Keir Starmer
- John threatens legal action if the government proceeds with the controversial Data (Use and Access) Bill
Another Day, Another Government Selling Out to Big Tech
Just when you thought politicians couldn’t get any more shameless in their corporate bootlicking, the UK’s Labour government has decided to hand over the creative works of artists to Silicon Valley overlords free of charge. Sir Elton John, never one to mince words, called the UK government “absolute losers” over their plans to exempt tech firms from copyright laws that would allow AI companies to train their algorithms on artists’ work without permission or compensation. This isn’t just bad policy—it’s legalized theft, plain and simple.
The legendary musician didn’t hold back in expressing his feelings about being “incredibly betrayed” by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s government. What’s particularly infuriating is that this comes from Labour, a party that claims to stand for working people. Apparently, that commitment doesn’t extend to working artists who depend on their intellectual property to make a living. Instead, the government seems far more interested in appeasing tech billionaires than protecting the rights of creators.
Democracy? What Democracy?
In a rare moment of sanity, the House of Lords actually voted in favor of amendments that would protect artists’ rights, requiring AI companies to disclose their source material and get proper consent before using copyrighted works. But did the “democratic” Labour government listen to this legislative check? Of course not! They promptly dismissed these recommendations, making it crystal clear where their loyalties lie—and it’s not with the creative class that helps define British cultural identity.
“committing theft, thievery on a high scale” – Elton John.
The controversial Data (Use and Access) Bill would allow AI systems to be trained on copyrighted works unless the copyright holders specifically opt out. This is a complete inversion of how intellectual property is supposed to work. Imagine if someone could walk into your house and take your possessions unless you specifically told them not to. That’s essentially what the UK government is proposing for artists’ creative works. It’s not just wrong—it’s fundamentally un-conservative and an assault on property rights.
The Big Tech Protection Racket
The revolving door between government and Big Tech is spinning faster than ever. Sir Elton specifically called out Technology Secretary Peter Kyle for being too cozy with tech companies. Reports show a suspicious increase in meetings between Kyle’s department and major tech firms since Labour’s election victory. It’s the same old story—politicians selling out their constituents to curry favor with wealthy corporations that can offer lucrative “consulting” jobs after they leave office.
Sir Elton John, along with over 400 artists including Paul McCartney, signed a letter to Prime Minister Starmer advocating for copyright safeguards against AI exploitation. These aren’t just wealthy established artists concerned about their millions—they’re fighting for the next generation of creators who lack the resources to stand up to trillion-dollar tech companies. As John pointed out, young artists without his platform and financial resources will be the real victims, deprived of both their legacy and income.
The Fight Is Just Beginning
The government’s spokesperson issued one of those infuriatingly dishonest statements claiming they won’t make changes to copyright laws “unless they benefit creators.” This is gaslighting of the highest order. How exactly does allowing tech companies to use artists’ work without permission or payment “benefit creators”? It’s like a burglar claiming they’re doing you a favor by taking your TV because they’re “expanding your audience.” Sir Elton made it clear he’s willing to take legal action if necessary—and the creative community may need to follow his lead.
This battle isn’t just about musicians—it’s about fundamental property rights and whether governments should be allowed to confiscate intellectual property for the benefit of tech monopolies. If they can do this to Elton John and Paul McCartney, they can do it to anyone. The UK government’s position is nothing less than digital communism dressed up in the language of innovation. They’re not just “losers,” as Sir Elton said—they’re thieves in suits, and it’s time for conservatives everywhere to stand against this brazen attack on property rights.
